Bill  Affleck (SH 45-51) and Drew Herdman (SH 45-48) have produced the  following article. I think Bill’s suggestion which follows is worth developing  and I would be glad to hear from any OSBs who would write up an account of  their ‘five years’ from 1951 onwards. Such articles would be a valuable record  of the social history of the school. (Ed) 
        
        “I have been pondering  on the land marks in the school's history along the way to the current  situation. It occurred to me that it might be possible to reconstruct this from  the memories of Old St Beghians, each recalling their time at school. The  attached is such a reconstruction from the immediate post war period. If this  could be combined with similar memories from subsequent, say 5-year periods we  might have a document which would be, at least, interesting and possibly  useful.”
        
        “St  Bees in 1945 was probably not a very different place from what it had been in  the early 1900s when my father was a pupil. It was all boys and, essentially,  all boarders. Dormitories and day rooms meant that there was little privacy.  You arrived by train at the start of term and you left by train at the end of  term. For some of the new boys this would be their first stay away from home;  for others, boarding in a prep school would have prepared you. For the older,  returning boys, it was of course familiar country which gave a sense of  superiority. For the overwhelming majority, parents were people with whom you  corresponded (by letter) and who might appear for Speech Day (sometimes in  Rolls Royces or Bentleys with a chauffeur in attendance) but certainly didn’t  expect and weren’t expected to visit during term time. One result of this was  that we knew remarkably little about other boys’ parents, whether they were of  a comparable class to our own or richer or poorer. The school was a great  social leveller in this respect. In fact in quite a lot of cases the boys were  the offspring of parents who were already in business and were leaders in their  fields, and in many cases the boy would later follow in the father’s footsteps. 
          
          Pupils  would probably have had no idea of the economics of the school at that time.  They wouldn’t know what it cost their parents to put them through St Bees but,  obviously, it was dramatically less than it would cost now - and that would  still be true if you took the inflationary corrections out of it. We knew,  dimly, that the school had been in financial trouble before the war (falling  enrolment following the Great Depression) and had been bailed out by the Old  Boys, but that was history and in the austere post war climate, the financial  health of the school wasn’t a (visible) concern. We probably thought the school  had significant income from its holdings on St Bees Head, not least from the  mining which was getting underway.
          
          You  started as a fag, fetching and carrying for a prefect and, if you deserved it  (and sometimes when you didn’t), being disciplined. There were intermediate  levels of repression so that the lower orders didn’t get ideas above their  station; your place in the hierarchy was known to both those above and below  you and it was a prerequisite of a tolerably quiet life that you knew it too.  In School House there were four levels, first year students were housed in Baby  Dayroom and their own dormitory - cold water only. Then year two you moved into  the Big Dayroom which meant that you were no longer called on to do 'fagging'  and had your own cubicle. Third year you moved into Junior Studies and a couple  of years later, if you were still there, into Senior Studies. Of course within  any year group not all the boys were equal and some no doubt don’t have very  happy memories of school; we didn’t think of it as bullying but that would  probably be the label now. Then there was the business of sex. In a single-sex  school some homosexual activity was inevitably a part of school life. Did some  boys emerge ‘damaged’ by the experience? Perhaps, but at the time it just  seemed part of the normal pattern of school life and by no means was everyone  involved. The senior boys would almost certainly have preferred girls - but the  supply was limited almost to the point of non-existence. 
          
          Over  the six or seven years of your schooling you might progress to being a prefect  and having a fag and beating the odd malefactor. There were housemasters, but  the running of the houses was, in practice, left very much to the house  prefects. The prefects were gods. They lived, literally and mentally, far above  us lesser mortals and ruled the roost with an iron fist, not the proverbial  hand. The head prefect even ruled the lesser ones. The sanctions available to  the prefects were varied. The level of punishment depended somewhat on your  level in the hierarchy and the level of transgression.
          
          For  example, a minor offence such as burning a prefect’s toast would earn you five  runs (or a hefty smack). This meant that you had to run five times around the  circumference of the house, watched by and the runs counted by the prefect who  ordered the punishment. There was in the bowels of the house the boiler room  where the coke-fed boiler resided which produced hot water. You could be sent  there with a couple of rounds of bread and a toasting fork to produce your  prefect’s toast.  As the door into the  furnace was a bit on the small side there would be much shoving and pushing to  get a good place but this led at times to toast being either underdone or  overdone. This would lead to the five runs penalty. For somewhat graver  offences you might get a hard smack on the legs or round the ear, and that was  that for a minor matter. For graver offences you got a serious beating; this  had overtones of a march to the scaffold. So how was it done? 
          
          The  house knew you were for it, and just before turning in time you were taken down  to the cellars where the boiler room and the changing rooms were. Beside the  boiler room there was a drying room with a sliding door. And into this room you  were put to wait. The door was shut. Silence for a few minutes then the sound  of footsteps. It sounded like rugger boots on concrete, which it may well have  been, they went past the door, up and down, up and down. Talk about  psycho/terror. Eventually the door crashed back and you were led into the  changing room. The first thing you saw was the chair - just an ordinary chair,  but with its back to you. Standing in one corner was the Housemaster, who had  to witness punishment, to see that it did not get really out of hand. The  beater stood there with the cane in his hand. This was a split bamboo with some  insulating tape at various intervals.   You were then told to bend over the back of the chair and to hold the  seat with both hands; you could not see the beater as he was behind you - and  he took a run at you, several steps - Step, step, step and then pain. This was  repeated until the designated number of strokes was administered. Not all  prefects were equally proficient at beating - but you got what you got. But,  and this was a point of honour,  you  never yelled, shouted or screamed no matter how it hurt -  and you just blinked away any tears too. No  sign of weakness was ever to be shown. When you got to your dormitory the  others were all agog. You then had to show your stripes. In a way it earned you  Brownie Points, as you were seen by the younger set and your peers to be tough.  In a way you were, even to yourself. Strange as it may seem people often cannot  remember the offences for which they were beaten. Punishment, then and even now  was not for the offence committed - but being caught at it.
          
          Just  as individuals in the school knew their place so the school collectively ‘knew  its place’. St Bees was a minor public school, never in contention with the  Etons and Harrows. We were, however, very definitely in the same league as  Rossall or Sedbergh, Durham or King Williams, IOM and any suggestion that these  were in any significant way superior to St Bees would have been seen as  treasonable. The local, west Cumbrian, schools, grammar or ‘normal’ were in a  league below and almost beneath contempt. The village boys were ‘wacketts’ and  formal contact non-existent. The same loyalty issues were apparent within the  school. We were of and for our house with an almost blind conviction that ours,  be it School House, Foundation North, Foundation South, or Grindal was the  best. Houses competed against each other in almost every field of activity.
          
          By  modern standards the level of creature comforts provided was meagre - but many  of us would have come to school from homes devoid of central heating or  unlimited hot water (weekly baths were scheduled rather than an everyday  expectation and woe betide anyone who filled the bath to more than five inches  depth). During all our time at school rationing was still in force so the meals  served were adequate rather than inspiring. Cafeteria style feeding had not yet  arrived and we sat, were served, and were made ‘truly thankful for what we  received’. While from the pupils’ standpoint it might have seemed rough, from  the school’s standpoint it kept the cost of supporting boarders down.
          
          A  word about health care; houses had their matrons, who were the first line for  sore throats, cuts and bruises and strains - rugger produced its proper quota  of injuries - and other  complaints.  Although matrons were one of the more sympathetic elements of the school  infrastructure, they weren’t a completely soft touch; the basic prescription  was to get on with life at school. Infectious diseases, mumps, measles and the  like, were a different matter. We had the Sanatorium, in Lonsdale Terrace, to  which you were dispatched until the risk of infecting others passed. The ‘San’  was a great leveller in that infection was no respecter of seniority; plebs and  prefects were forced to co-habit. The radio (or was it still the wireless?)  provided a link with the outside world and very well remembered was a sixth  former telling us that no, we couldn’t ‘bloody well listen to 
          Dick-****-Barton’  - perhaps the levelling wasn’t that complete!
          
          Academic  achievement was recognised but in the general perception of the boys - and most  of the masters - holding a place on the rugger 1st XV was a more  significant achievement than excellent High School Certificate results. These  were long before the days when there was any expectation that going on to  university would be seen as a normal goal; yes, some did, but very often it was  a surprising discovery that someone whose reputation at school rested on his  performance on the rugger field had academic potential as well. Although there  was, and remains amongst Old St Beghians, a strong sporting bias the school was  by no means a cultural desert; there was music (with, inevitably, inter-House  competitions), drama (Gilbert and Sullivan was very much in vogue during my  time), and debating. We went to the cinema in Whitehaven (I have memories of  seeing Olivier’s Henry V from the extreme end of the front row) and there were  16mm film shows in Big School, not always technically trouble free (memories of  an interrupted screening of ‘The Lady Vanishes’ of which it was said (T. A.  Brown) that it was the film not the lady who vanished!).
          
        In  an era before ‘league tables’ it’s difficult to gauge the school’s academic  performance. With ‘tri-weekly’ test results we knew where we stood in relation  to our peers and if there were any expressions of concern about our  competitiveness with other schools in our league, we didn’t know of them. We  emerged (apparently) adequately qualified for the job market. What we did carry  away from school was a certain toughness (to which the short trousers and  Cumbrian weather no doubt contributed as well as the school regime) and a sense  of responsibility. Basic training during National Service presented few terrors  for the old St Beghian, nor, we’re told, did prison. The other thing, looking  back from 2015, was the sense of rightness for the school and the way it ran.  There were no advocates for change; this was the way things were; it was good  enough for our predecessors and it would be good enough for those who would  follow us. 
That was the way it looked in 1951.”